AND THE WORLD
TELL THE TRUTH NEWS
It would be much easier to believe Roy Moore's accusers if he had done anything illegal like touching a 14 year old or even something unethical during the past 40 years. Pedophiles and abusers don't simply stop being pedophiles and abusers. Have there been any accusations or examples questioning Moore's morality the past 40 years?
As much as we may want to, we do not convict people without proof. Had Monica Lewinski not saved her blue dress, Clinton would have never gone through Impeachment. Without pictures, Al Franken would be hard to force out of the Senate. Without provable time and date coaboration of so many women, Weinstien would still be abusing his power.
Is the story of the 14 year old true? It could be.
EVERY OTHER ACCUSATION BEING HURLED AT ROY MOORE WITH THE ACCUSATION OF BEING "A MONSTEROUS PEDOPHILE" DESERVING OF HELL EVEN THOUGH HE HAS NOT BEEN ACCUSED OF ONE IMPROPIETY IN THE PAST 40 YEARS, HAS BEEN A COMPLETE LIE. HIS DATING OR EVEN GOING OUT OR HAVING SEX WITH WILLING 16 YEAR OLDS IS BEHAVIOR THAT WAS, if ethically questionable or even reprehensable, COMPLETELY LEGAL.
WHAT THE MEDIA IS NOT TELLING YOU:
1. It may not be my choice or your choice, but it is 100 % legal for 30+ year old man or, (sorry to paint the pictue) an 80+ year old man, to date and even have sex with any willing female partner from the day they turn 16.
2. Certaily not all women, but as with Moore, 100 percent of girls that complained after I held hands or kissed them (from my teen years) completely lied about it and falsely accused me to protect thier own self-righteous reputations.
Roy Moore gets legally touchy feely with a few girls of legal age, 16-19 years old? Sounds like 95-98 % of 16-21 year old American males and about 99.9 % of political males over 30 who have either done it or who have similarly fantasized about teen girls.
Only one girl was supposedly underage (14). But even that is very politically suspicious. It is unproven and coud possibly be a politically motivated lie.
We don't presume guilt. We are supposed to presume innocence, we are to weigh the evidence if any, determine the political influence and timimg of testimony, and, no matter what the testimony, presume innocence if there is no proof.
not an indictment.
As much as we might not like it, in America, IF it is not provable, you get a walk. The lady of the 14 year old story may have been paid by Obama's Deep state tentacles.
Even according to all testimonies of the women, Moore had no actual nudity with the girls, does what the various girls ask and stops and takes them home. NO NUDITY, NO SEX, NO MASTURBATION, NO ORAL SEX, NO INTERCOURSE, and all OVER 40 YEARS AGO DURING THE FREE SEX AND HOLLYWOOD PEDOPHILE GLORY DAYS which have cintnued unabated to this day. YET HE'S ASKED TO RESIGN because a supposed, unproven 14 year-old looked and acted 20 and claims Moore touched her but stopped and immediate drove her home when he found out she was under 16?
Guilty until proven innocent? Do our hypocritcal leaders hate our Constitution that much, or just hate conservative Republicans that much? This seems to be lable politics at its best!
Sex was legal at 16 in Alabama. If you don't like the fact that a 16 year old can have sex with a 90 year old, change the law. If powerful presidents shouldn't have sex with interns, do something about it instead of sitting on it like hypocrites an liars for 30 years.
I am not saying Moore is innocent or guilty, but accusing him of liking legal teens when he was in his 30s is irrelavent. And not investigating millions of men in America who are acutally pedaphiles, in the arts, politics, and Hollywood is even more disgusting. I would have a bit more outrage if Moore had been seriously abusing women for the past 40 years like Kennedy, Johnson, and Clinton, lying to and cheating on their wives.
Why does the left never criticize or investigate the millions of Muslim men in America, in Muslim countries where pedophila is legalizeed with thigh sex with under age girls (under 9!!!).
Maybe Moore WAS oriented toward 16-19 year old teen women. Is that legal orientation sinful to the liberals?
CLINTON, on the other hand, grabs, licks, has oral sex, sodomy, and ejaculates his material all over many women including a SUBORDINATE intern (a fireable offense in any situation) under the Oval Office desk, commits serial adultery, lies and commits purgery, but is not asked to step down by the Dems and praised as an upstanding leader as though he were St. John the Divine to this very day!!! Go figure.
Moore's accusers say that he had the integrity and descency to stop, not force himself on the girls, and even drive them home. It doesnt add up to the hell deserving monster Ivnka Trump "unconstitutionally" made him out to be by pre-judging. (Ivanka is a total hypocrite and Constitutionally ignorant on LGBT and right to conscience issues, another subject!)
Its just the same reason the Dems and Establishment Republicans HATE all conservatives and Trump...though they signed a Resolution condeming HATE IN ALL ITS FORMS!!! Hmmmm, well, condeming only other people's hate...not their own!! Liberal logic!
The Establishment Republicans should be impeached and Roy Moore should be forgiven for this unprovable even if true indiscretion that happened 40 years ago with no pattern of serial abuse comparable to Clinton Kennedy, Johnson, and most of those who are throwing stones.